written by UNITAS, La Unión Nacional de Instituciones para el Trabajo de Acción Social 

Multiple voices were being heard, both within the wider Bolivian society and the governing party, in response to the failure of the Plurinational Constitutional Court (TCP) to observe the Principle of Constitutional Supremacy when it allowed Evo Morales Ayma and Álvaro García Linera to be re-elected indefinitely. Forus member in Bolivia UNITAS published a public statement in defence of democracy.  

Warnings had been sounded about possible irregularities in the organisation and conduct of the national elections, given the failure to observe the Principle of Legal Security, understood as the objective application of the law so that people are aware of their rights, guarantees and obligations and all acts by organs of state are seen as reliable and predictable. 

A clear deterioration in democracy and its institutions was already noticeable, given the failure to observe the Principle of Independence and the evident subordination of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) to another organ of state. Multiple  dissenting  voices  were  being  heard,  both  within  and  outside  the  governing  party,  and especially among the wider Bolivian society from the East to the West of the country, in response to the failure of the Plurinational Constitutional Court (TCP) to observe the Principle of Constitutional Supremacy  when  it allowed Evo  Morales  Ayma  and Álvaro García  Linera to  be  re-elected indefinitely, giving preference to the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights over and above the  four  articles  in  the  Constitution  of  the  Plurinational  State  which  do  not  permit  indefinite  re-election. By giving priority to the TCP’s ruling, the Electoral Authority failed to respect the result of the Constitutional Referendum held in 2016, in  which the Bolivian people rejected the proposal to modify  Article 168 of the  Constitution  and  51  per  cent  voted  No  to  the  re-election  of Morales and García Linera. 

The deep exhaustion of a process of change that refuses to change was already perceptible, given the failure of the State to observe the Principles of Transparency, Honesty and Trust. Instead, the so-called “process of change” is aggravating the polarization of society, clientelism and the co-opting of those who previously rejected a model of governance that is now reproducing itself with ever-improving aptitude in ignoring and nullifying the will  of  the  people –both  pro-government voters and those that support other political parties. A  number  of  different  events  had  been  piling  up,  but  the  trigger  that  made  democracy  in Bolivia crack happened on Sunday 20 October, at 19:40, when the Supreme Electoral Tribunal published the  figures  from  the Transmission of  Preliminary  Electoral Results  (TREP) system  when  the  vote count  stood  at 83%, indicating  that  there  would  be  a  second  round  pitting  Evo  Morales  against Carlos  Mesa. At that point the vote count was suspended, and 24 hours  later  the  TREP  figures were updated showing that with more than 90% of the votes counted, the voting trend had shifted and the MAS  looked  to  be the outright winner.  

The Electoral Observation Mission of the Organization of American States (OAS)described what had happened as “inexplicable”, while the European Union expressed “serious doubts” about the TSE’s electronic vote count.  Citizens flooded the streets in protest, electoral tribunal buildings were set on fire, and there was widespread damage, clashes between opposing  groups  of  citizens  and  the  use  of  force  by  the police. The  celebration  of  democracy  that  took  place  on 20 October  when  the  Bolivian  people  flocked  to the  ballot  boxes  to  fulfil  their  duty  as  citizens  and  exercise  their  right  to  vote, was  marred  by the questionable actions of the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, confirming the institutional lack of respect for democracy that has characterised it in recent years. 

The citizens of Bolivia neither accept nor trust the results of the recent election and are willing to mobilise to demand respect for the will of the voters and their rights.  The feeling that fraud has been committed is reinforced by the speeches given by the governing party declaring victory for the MAS party and denying any possibility of a second round, even though the partial results indicated that a second round would be inevitable.

Therefore, the National Union  of  Institutions for Social  Action Work,  in  defence  of  democracy  and the state of law: 

1. Expresses its disagreement with the actions taken by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, and demands that its members resign due to the irresponsible way they have  conducted  the election process. 

2. Calls on national authorities to prepare for the second round of national elections, in the interests of peace in the country and respect for citizens, and in keeping with the principle of letting the people take the final decision. In any electoral contest there are rules that must be respected. 

3. Demands that the relevant authorities conduct the necessary investigations to identify and sanction the people responsible for the different irregularities reported by citizens during the national election process. 

4. Urges all Bolivian citizens to express their opinion and state their position peacefully, and demand fulfilment of their rights in an atmosphere of respect and peace, in the interests of maintaining social cohesion around the ethics of democracy and the common good. 

5. Ratifies its commitment to defend democracy and the exercise of the right to protest, as a manifestation of the three fundamental freedoms (freedom of association, peaceful assembly and expression) and to ensure control of state power. 

6. Exhorts the authorities and law enforcement agents to respect international law on the protection of human rights, and refrain from the arbitrary and disproportionate use of force and the repression of social protests. 

7. Repudiates acts of physical aggression such as those suffered by the human rights defender, Waldo Albarracín, while exercising his right to defend democracy, and any repetition of such acts, leading to more violence during citizen protests. It is essential to investigate so that no act of violence against citizens is left in impunity. 

8. Condemns the unfortunate events that led to acts of vandalism affecting public property and the safety of citizens in several of the country’s departments. Due process must be guaranteed in all cases to investigate and punish instigators and perpetrators. For a dignified and democratic Bolivia!